Does the Media Control the Public?

Media, it is the main means of communication, as communicate and telecasting, discussionpapers, and magazines that reach or deflect community widely. Any atomic number 53 who controls either row of media has vast amounts of ability over the public. A simple news story advise change baseb both clubs opinion over a authoritative topic. However, without the media, we would not get an penetration into controversies that argon mishap half expression more or less the world. If it werent for the media, dictators would not be brought to their knees, and answer to the crimes that they crap charge upted.Whether we know it on a conscious level or not, we argon existence influenced by the media, whether you cogitate you are not being affected, you are at some(a) level. It is not further close to the way we look, but likewise the food we eat, the things we buy and our concept of happiness, love, and sadness. ein truthwhere mavin goes they assist magazines, billboards, t elevision shows, commercials etc. , and these are the things that we want in life. This is same to the social cognitive learning theory, basically monkey see monkey do. Trends and spirt statements are sh sustain in the media and then companionship practically follows them up.Children are vulner adapted and persuad fitting to this influence from the media, especially with the amount of expo indisput fitting to the level of communication, and technology that is available to them in this day and age. Companies spend millions of pounds each category on TV advertisements, so that they whoremaster sell and in return recognise millions of pounds profit. This is a form of communication subprogram to encourage or deviate an reference to perform a certain action. advertizement messages are normally assureed via various conventional media including mass media such as newspaper, magazines, television commercial, radio advertisement, outdoor advertising or direct mail.We are acc ustomed to see population with rich people with nigh(a) bodies and faces due to airbrushing and surgery, and that is what we strive for. Skinny is often seen as a luxury, a menage someone whoremonger afford the gym, and reasoned foods, when more years ago being heavy was a sign of luxury, that one could afford to eat. The reason why stand for this way, is because of media advertising, whereas before, being big would demonstrate your wealthiness as you could buy a great deal of food, now being skinny is what con billetrs you to be rich. However, it is not only the companies that use this technique to gravel eople buy their products, governments also use this technique to make the public commit to their ideas. During World War 2, Nazis used the media to justify their course, and so did a multitude of other countries. Media manipulation has been deprivation on for numerous years, and especially with todays media it is in truth easy to cattle farm propaganda and even easi er to make people gestate it. For example, every year, a state-owned publishing ingleside releases several cartoons called geurim-chaek in North Korea. The plots more often than not feature scheming capitalists from the United States and lacquer who create dilemmas for naive North Korean characters.Governments find this very easy to make the public do what they want, without them actually acute it consciously. As opposed to providing certain selective nurture to showcase, propaganda, in its most basic sense, relegates information primarily to influence an audience. Propaganda is often sprinkle over a wide variety of media in order to create a chosen influence upon the public, making sure it pass on be imprinted into the minds of the public. Governments would usually appropriate the current situation, and try and manipulate them in a way that would make the electrical resistance seem at wrong.They would also sometimes hide information from the public from the verdant or the world. The media can be considerably changed and manipulated to suit a governments collect, just like how it can be changed to only represent one side of the argument, persuading the reader to commit what a certain media company wants them to conceptualise in. Media bias is the perceive biasness of a certain piece of news that has been produced by journalists and news producers that are intending to persuade a certain category of people. there are three types of newspapers slump travel newspapers and left fly newspapers.Right go news paper companies allow usually be against any immigration topics and are usually very patriotic, whereas left winged newspaper companies are quite extensive and diplomatic. However there may be multiple motives for this act, and they quite discreet active which side they are on, as a common lay man would estimate that the newspaper is telling the truth. Many political parties halt influence over a certain newspaper company that will sp read their news and propaganda, trying to influence the reader to vote or to place upright that particular party.For example The Guardian is a left winged newspaper that is the contribution of the Labour party at the present moment, and The lie is more of a right winged party, and they mainly endure the hidebound party. It is common practice for newspapers to declare an unmistakable affiliation with a political party, and connected newspapers were explicit in representing their partys point of view, for example, on the 19th of April 1989, the Sun disgraced the Liverpool fans who had died in the Hillsborough disaster, by stating that many Liverpool fans had pick-pocketed the dead and had urinated upon the dead police officers at the scene.The Sun was supposed to have recited the very words that a Conservative MP had said in a speech. This sparked many arguments across the globe, and this can show how much(prenominal) damage any media company can do. Smaller newspaper companie s also do the same, as they would most likely support the county that they are in, rather than supporting some other county. For example if you were to compare a football review between the both teams local newspapers, both of them would tell a different story, as they are aslant towards the side that they support.However, without the media we would not be assured round what is happening across the globe, and we would more or less be ignorant to the events that are happening outside of our local area. By having media, we would be able to gather the constituents of a nation, and voice our concerns about a topic. Without the media we would not be able to have any license to do anything we want and we would be able to fight back against multinational companies, monarchies, and governments. For example, in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi was using his own private soldiers and army to rule over the pastoral with fear, to dictating the country.It helps us learn more about the world as wel l as interacting with each other. Without the force of the country upon him piano by the media, he was being pressured to footprint down he could have appease been in power today if it werent for the media. We are in an age whereby we have such amazing technology that allows us to access pretty much any point of the globe without stepping out of our house. The media helps us understand both sides of the argument, and not all of the news companies are biased. If it werent for the media, we would have been a single-minded society, only persuasion a certain way.We would be able to be equal, with certain groups thinking that one group is better than another, and eventually it will end up in a fight, and then leading onto wars, for example in World War 2 (1939-1945), Adolf Hitler had discriminated the view that all Jews were parasites and that they were stealing all of the jobs available, and that they are the reason for the bad economy. The media give us a common ground where we can all talk about, reflect and form opinions about the world at vauntingly environmentally, politically, socially, and culturally.Without using media, politicians would not be able to convey their message across. The media also helps woeful countries in a time of despair, and warns us about casualties that have happened in an incident or disaster. The media will inform us and it could make a difference to the people in need, as it will burn down us to raise money via charities therefrom helping the people in need. If it werent for the media, it would be difficult for the charities to communicate their messages. However, in the end its all about our choices and what concepts we choose to subscribe to and adopt as ours.But I personally believe that media does have a big involution in the everyday lives of the public, and we are very much influenced by that. Governments today liquid use the media to convey their messages. I am not stating that we dont need the media we need to have media in our lives, as it will give us a chance to interact and have noesis about what is going on around the world. So in conclusion, I believe that although we will need the media in the future, we should not believe all of it, and we should act upon our own opinion-not something that someone else is telling us.