Science in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Hard Times by Charles Dicken

The nineteenth century was a time of massive change companionablely, politically and scientifically. This time saw the rise of Imperialism and of the Industrial Revolution in Britain, see massive changes in the way industry was run. Also during this time the literary movements of Romanticism and Victorianism emerged. Romanticism dealt with the issues of reality versus illusion, childhood and man versus nature. The first have I go away examine in this essay, Mary Shelleys Frankenstein, comes from this literary period and focuses on the man versus nature theme, namely the theme of scientific development and its contrast to nature. The second book I leave alone look at in this essay comes from the Victorian period of the 19th century. This period saw the rise of the Industrial Revolution and of huge social and political change. Hard Times by Charles Dickens deals with these issues really closely, counselling mainly on the rise of industry in Britain and its effects on the people of Britain. Both of these novels challenge the social, political and scientific developments of the 19th century, namely the advent of science and technology.Mary Shelleys Frankenstein has become almost a myth in our culture it so deeply probes the collective pagan psyche and our fear of science and progress. Frankenstein is our cultures most go into literary analysis of the psychology of modern scientific man, of the dangers inherent in scientific research, and the exploitation of nature and of the female implicit in a technological society (Mellor, 198838). The interesting thing about Frankenstein is that there chamberpot be multiple readings of the text. It can be seen as a materialistic criticism of science, a Promethean belief of the unlimited progress of science, the feminist anti-female article of faith angle to the layer, even a religion versus science story. What I will explore through this essay is each of these readings and shed some percipient on this wonderful no vel. The value of Mary Shelleys novel lies not in presenting a clear morale but encouraging the readers to crystalize up their own (members.aon.at.htm). The most obvious and well-known theory of the story of Frankenstein is that of a sample to the dangers of science Mary Shelleys implicit warning against possible dangers inherent in the technological developments of modern science (Mellor, 1988114). Shelley was very interested in ... ... David Copperfield and Hard Times, New York Macmillan Press.6.Small, C. (1972) Mary Shelleys Frankenstein-Tracing the Myth, Pittsburgh University Of Pittsburgh Press.7.Shelley, M. (1996) Frankenstein A Norton Critical Edition, New York W.W. Norton & Company.8.Tambing, J. (1995) Dickens, Violence and The Modern State, London Macmillan Press.9.Ashbury, M (2001) pattern of Industrialization in Dickens Hard Times Online. Available http//www.colourpurple.com Accessed twenty-fifth April 2005.10.Allingham, P. (2000) Charles Dickens Hard Times for These Times as an Industrial clean Online. Available http//www.victoriaweb.com Accessed 25th April 2005.11.Rohrmoser, A. (2004) The Origin of a Myth Mary Shelleys legend Frankenstein Online. Available http//membersaon.at.htm Accessed 25th April 2005.12.Oldham, R. (2000) Charles Dickens Hard Times Romantic cataclysm of Proletariat Propaganda Online. Available http//www.pillowrock.com Accessed 25th April 2005.13.Frankenstein a science-fiction novel or a scientific fiction? Online, (2001). Available http//gala.univ-perp.fr Accessed 25th April 2005.