Comparison Between Parse Theory & Watson Theory Essay

Comparison Between Parse scheme & Watson Theory - Essay ExampleThe human becoming surmisal hand overs a clear view of a persons will to achieve goal through the nursing practice. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse had initi in ally published the theory in 1981 as the Man- reinforcement-health theory, but later in 1992, the name was officially changed to the human becoming theory to obliterate the term man from the theory, after the alteration in the dictionary definition of the word from its previous subject matter of humankind. The human becoming theory was presented as a human science nursing theory in the practice of Heidegger, Dilthey, Merleau-Ponty, Gadamer and Sartre. Many of the European philosophers such as Heidegger, Sartre, and Merleau-Ponty, along with works by the start American nurse theorist, Martha Rogers, synthesized the assumptions supporting the theory. The theory itself is structured around three unshakable matters or themes, those be meaning, rhythmicity, and transcende nce.The first theme, which is meaning, has been mentioned in the first principle of the theory, which states Structuring meaning multidimensionally is cocreating reality through the languaging of valuing and imaging. The principle subject matter that people take interest in creating what is real for them through self-expression in living their values in a predetermined way. For instance a person who has to be an actor acts at many occasions, this happens because the actors moreover concern is with acting and in order to make people realize about his ability, the actor keeps on acting at most of the public places. This means that there is a hope in that persons life, which makes him to act.The heartbeat theme is rhythmicity, which has been expressed in the second principle of the theory, which states, Co-creating rhythmical patterns of relating is living the paradoxical unity of revealing-concealing and enabling-limiting opus connecting-separating. This principle means that the u nity of life includes noticeable opposites in regular patterns of relating. It means that in living life continuously and in small parts one shows and does not show self as opportunities and boundaries appear in moving with and apart from others. For instance, at durations we look for opportunities in life and give sacrifices to avail it, at times according to the situation we lie to others about few matters and hide our things that if know to others can make us ashamed, although every lie is unintentional but we have to lie as not doing so can cause many other problems, it is not something we are in estimation of doing always, yet we get bounded to do so. The third theme is transcendence, which is discussed in the third principle of the theory, which states Cotranscending with the possibles is powering erratic ways of originating in the process of transforming. This principle means that moving away from the present moment is interchangeable making a unique personal path for one self, which creates a lot of confusion and also keeps on changing. A good example in everyday life is that all of us keep on dreaming about various things, even when it comes to take decision of our lives, we keep on changing them time after time as we do not keep in mind one goal. The topographic point to be made is that, we all should keep on living life as it has come to us, all